Delaware Court of Chancery Upholds Magistrate’s Rulings Refusing to Invalidate Estate Documents for Lack of Capacity and Undue Influence

This opinion represented the court’s decision on Plaintiff’s exceptions to the Magistrate’s post-trial Final Report.  After explaining its reasoning, the court overruled the exceptions and affirmed the Final Report.

In 1993, Charles B. Kelley (“Decedent”), established a revocable trust. Charles B. Kelley, Jr. (“Plaintiff”), was the only surviving child of Decedent and the primary beneficiary. In 2020, Decedent’s health began to decline, and medical records indicated episodes of confusion. Plaintiff then moved into Decedent’s home to provide full-time care. The relationship between Decedent and Plaintiff began to deteriorate resulting in a heated argument on Easter Sunday 2020. Following this argument, Decedent requested Plaintiff leave his home. After Plaintiff left, Decedent’s neighbor Kristina began to provide assistance.

In May of 2020, Decedent contacted Leslie DiPietro, an estate planning attorney, stating he had a desire to remove Plaintiff as beneficiary of his estate. DiPietro then drafted the documents to remove Plaintiff. Those documents were signed on July 16, 2020 (the “2020 Documents”). In November of 2020, after Kristina had moved away, Decedent’s neighbor, Defendant Juli Decker, became involved with Decedent’s care. At this time Decedent sought to make additional changes to his estate plan. Decedent authorized Decker to communicate with DiPietro. New documents were drafted and executed on March 1, 2021 (the “2021 Documents”), with Decedent, Decker and Decedent’s caregiver present. These documents benefited Decker, other individuals and charities. Decedent then passed away April 7, 2021.

Following Decedent’s death, Plaintiff initiated a lawsuit on November 8, 2021. Plaintiff sought to invalidate both the 2020 and 2021 Documents for lack of capacity and undue influence. The trial took place from March 4 to 6, 2024. A final report was then issued December 27, 2024 to which Plaintiff took exception on six alleged grounds: (1) the 2020 and 2021 Documents were analyzed collectively instead of separately; (2) too little weight was given to Kristina and Decker’s influence; (3) too much weight was given to DiPietro’s testimony; (4) the burden of proof was assigned to Plaintiff; (5) Plaintiff’s request for fees was denied; and (6) a no contest clause was found triggered.

First, the Court of Chancery found viewing the 2020 Documents and 2021 Documents together was “logical and appropriate.” Second, the court analyzed undue influence for Kristina in 2020 and Decker in 2021. DiPietro testified that Decedent was “competent and not unduly influenced when he signed the 2020 Documents.” Additionally, the court found no evidence providing assertion or influence, instead concluding that Decedent’s decision was likely influenced by the Easter Sunday 2020 argument. Regarding the 2021 Documents, the court relied again on DiPietro’s testimony. Despite having benefited from the 2021 Documents, the court found “no evidence of Decker compelling Decedent to change his will against his true wishes.” The court again noted the change was consistent with Decedent’s desire to remove Plaintiff from his estate. Third, the court found testimony from DiPietro, “a disinterested and experienced estate attorney”, should be given considerable weight. DiPietro “took diligent steps to ensure Decedent’s true intentions” and “spoke with Decedent alone to confirm.” Fourth, the court held the burden shift was inappropriate as DiPietro received no benefit from drafting the new estate documents.

The court also upheld Plaintiff’s request for fees being denied. The court reasoned Plaintiff had failed to show a lack of testamentary capacity and that the estate itself did not benefit from Plaintiff’s suit. Lastly, the court held the no contest clause was triggered as “Delaware enforces no contest or in terrorem clauses”  and that Plaintiff, by his actions, had forfeited his $10,000 bequest.

This blog entry was primarily authored by Catharine Kern.

© 2026 Gordon, Fournaris & Mammarella, P.A. Disclaimer Sitemap
Site by LISI